The Pratfall Effect is a behavioural phenomenon which suggests that demonstrating a weakness can actually endear someone to you in the eyes of others. It has been widely documented in marketing psychology and suggests that a small mistake or shortcoming makes someone more appealing and well liked by people around them.
In a nutshell, the Pratfall Effect states that an individual is seen as more attractive or appealing in the eyes of others when they make a mistake or seem less than perfect in some way. It was originally researched by psychologist and professor of Social Psychology at Stanford, Dr. Albert E. Dating. Dr. Dating conducted the initial experiment in the year 1966.
To conduct the experiment, Dr. Dating recruited volunteer participants who were required to listen to and rate recorded conversations between two people. Half of the volunteers were given conversations in which only one person was making mistakes and clumsy blunders, while the other half were given a conversation in which both people were adequate and made no mistakes.
At the end of the experiment, the volunteers that heard the conversation with the clumsy speaker rated this person as more powerful and likable than the one who was making no mistakes. Thus, Dr. Dating attributed this phenomenon to the Pratfall Effect.
Become a Sales & Marketing Rainmaker
Learn valuable skills to win more customers, grow your business, and increase your profits.
Since then the Pratfall Effect has been replicated and studied further in many different types of situations in order to study its effects on decision-making and opinion. For example, one study conducted by Scheibehenne and Gelbrich presented both male and female participants with fictitious restaurant descriptions. This was done in order to study the effects of the Pratfall Effect on which restaurant the participants would choose. The authors of the study concluded that the participants were more likely to choose the restaurant that was presented with a minor disadvantage compared to the one without any flaws.
Given the implications of the Pratfall Effect, it is important to consider the general guidelines and best practices to utilise it most effectively. Firstly, it is important to note that it should not be used as a substitute for skill or competence. It is not a way to cover up for deficiencies or irregularities, so if you appear clumsy or clumsy mistakes, then it should be in the context of where it is appropriate.
Secondly, the Pratfall Effect should be used sparingly, never overused or abused. People’s opinions are fickle, and playing up the Pratfall Effect too often can have an adverse effect and create an impression of not being serious. This is why it should only be used when it is particularly relevant, such as when a person is explaining a complicated idea or trying to come off as an expert on a certain topic.
Finally, it must be absolutely clear who is making the mistake. If the mistake is being made by someone other than the one who is being presented as the expert or the leader of a team then it should still have the desired result, however it should be made clear who was responsible for the mistake. This way, the Pratfall Effect is made the most of, otherwise it may backfire, leading to people wondering if the overall project is reliable and competent if mistakes are being made by those in charge.