A judgment sample, also known as a judgemental sample, is a type of non-probability sampling that involves choosing study participants based on the researcher’s personal judgement about which individuals are most appropriate for a study. Rather than a random selection process, a judgment sample allows researchers to be proactive when deciding who to include. This type of sample has several advantages in certain situations, but there are also some potential drawbacks to consider.
The advantages of a judgment sample are that it can be used when gathering data in an area that doesn't have an existing population list, such as a new social trend or a rapidly changing market. Researchers can also choose participants that are more likely to provide information that is in-depth and reflective of the topic being studied. Another benefit of using a judgment sample is the ability to select participants with more subject matter expertise. This can help limit the amount of time needed for research.
There are some drawbacks to using a judgment sample, including the fact that the sample is not representative of a larger population. Because the selection process is based on the researcher’s priorities, the sample may become biased or not reflect the true diversity of the group being studied. There is also the risk of conflating one’s own biases and beliefs with the results of the study.
When deciding whether to use a judgment sample, the researcher must consider the scope of their study. If the sample is intended to represent a larger population, other types of sampling should be considered. If the study goals can be achieved with a smaller sample, however, a judgment sample may be a suitable approach.
Become a Sales & Marketing Rainmaker
Learn valuable skills to win more customers, grow your business, and increase your profits.
There are several general guidelines and best practices to follow when using a judgment sample. First, the researcher must be aware of their own biases and assumptions, and make a concerted effort to select a sample that reflects the true diversity of the population. The criteria for inclusion should be clearly defined and consistent for all participants. It is also important for the researcher to consider the sample size, ensuring that it is large enough to accurately reflect the population but not so large as to be unmanageable.
It is also important to document all selection criteria in a written statement and disclose the selection process to participants. This will help avoid any potential misinterpretations of the results. Finally, the researcher should consult with an independent sampling expert to ensure that their sample is free of bias.
A judgment sample can be a useful tool for researchers who are working in areas with rapidly changing or difficult to pin down populations. There are some advantages to this approach, but there are also potential pitfalls to consider. While this type of sampling should be used carefully, following appropriate guidelines and best practices can help mitigate any potential problems.